soccer

The famed American psychologist Wayne W.Dyer author of books as widely known as “Your Erroneous Zones” or “Ten Secrets for Success and Inner Peace”, says that failure is only an illusion and I really think that is whattrue.

An example with football.If a player throws a party for door trying to get a goal but the ball goes into the stands and that ruling does not win, you might think that’s a failure and if the match is critical, butcoldly analyzing things you could simply say that it is a fact that has produced an outcome, not a failure.

You can fail an open goal, but that was very appealing that decision should never be analyzed in terms of failure, because that will always determine subsequent actions that they take place.Always go back to try again and forget about the above error.

Returning to Wayne W.Dyer says that failure is only an opinion and a matter of opinion, therefore, specifically in football, and this applies to players and coaches, let’s not get carried away by the assessments carried out other.Anybody make us believe that we have failed at something when a failure is simply the result of an action we have done and we will always have the opportunity to re-run correctly, another thing is the importance we want to give.

In many cases it is other people and yourself that is predisposed to what we believe is a failure, so it must be avoided at all times those negative thoughts that lead us directly to things going wrong that produce anxiety anddepression and that conditions us greatly.

It is the ego in these cases a bad ally that frightens us say the idea that one is a failure and that shame can contact us by causing us anxiety just thinking that one will not live up to the circumstancesand this in the sports field is given continuously.

If we take the players there are certain we would call irrational thoughts that accompany them before a game and should be replaced with better ones to avoid that feeling of failure.

Before the game:

Example “A”, “A player wants to make a great game for the coach is satisfied with its performance, otherwise think that if your game has not been good enough, not coming back to play first the next game”.

Thinking +: “The player thinks of playing the game my best and if things go wrong you will always have another chance to play again and secure holder that things will go better.”

After the game:

Example “B”.”The player thinks that there should be better trained before playing the game, believes he has made a fool, he regrets having made little effort in training and feels guilty for the defeat of his team.”

Thinking +: “I will work harder and better in practice to be on top in the next match, I can do much better and both victories as defeats are a work of the whole team.”

In closing, I would say it is very important when producing bad results or mistakes are always judged to be the facts coldly and to seek to eliminate drastic absolutist terms that usually occur in the sport as expressions of “this is aout of life or death “or” never again have another chance “that only serves to add a dose of pressure” extra “that no benefit. Pick Up Soccer,Soccer News,Soccer Community

Soccer

A few dates Real Madrid coach Jose Mourinho said in reference to the enormous love that exists in Spain for football in this country had 40 million coaches, and although this claim is highly exaggerated, it is true that allor the vast majority of football fans, have a coach in, that does not mean that knowledge of the matter is the same in all people.

Of course all opinions are respected and everyone says what he thinks or what he pleases, and football themes tastes are like colors.Another thing is that those who consider is right in what he says or that their comments are more or less successful.

As coaches, which are always the preferred target for the darts thrown by press and fans, it is curious to see how many people on both sides are convinced they know more about football than the coaches themselves, and we are not referring toany technical, but those in the elite, the top level, those who have already accumulated titles in their records of all kinds, yet even these are saved from continuous criticism often as you can see, istotally unfair, lack of arguments, partial and interested.

Another thing is that coaches make mistakes, they do, are human and make mistakes just like it does a journalist, a lawyer, a politician, a doctor or a plumber.Good coaches make mistakes and that some are less so.

So far, so normal, but what ever it is found are the mistakes that some of the alleged meanings and “experts” make, and in some cases are so glaring, that they would derive the “colors” to anyone with a minimal senseridicule, but we can see again and again, that we must insist and insist on his mistakes, although after last time, are totally with the “ass in the air,” as they say in these cases.And all this can be seen very easily, just by looking at the newspaper and television archives, among other sources.

Football is a sport so well known throughout the world, all make their judgments of value, you all know, everyone says, while respecting freedom of opinion that all people have, indeed, that not everyone has the same level of knowledge, and this is not really serious, which is detrimental to the sport in particular, are those who always see the negative side of things, those who continually want to assert their judgment above all, those who judge with totalbias, and in the case of football coach, those who think in terms of how they personally fall technician on duty, when you have to assess is your job, your ability and knowledge, above all other issues and concernsthat often the general public are completely unaware.

Those who presume to know so much about football, which allowed coaches to lecture (the same as they won the Champions League, European Championship or World Cup), and are continually signaling to the bench professionals who need to get alignment,which game system to use, what changes do and everything you can think of (the case is fault and criticize, without worrying much about the objectivity of their approach), should be more critical, but with themselves, and see ifprofessional activity they perform, are really as effective would be expected from their high standards for others.

And as always the same and at the end when sentencing time, no one gives the “face” and acknowledge their mistakes (or very few people do), we often ask for example where are the singing that Benitezgo now, when only very recently that Valencia had won the league?(He left the club Levante to win the Champions League with Liverpool), and where they hid that before Euro mercilessly criticized Luis Aragones and said it was already obsolete?.It’s like those who say that Mourinho’s teams are dedicated only to defend, though, and soon the time is taking care to prove otherwise.

In the end, preserving the views of each other, there are few who acknowledge their mistakes, many times to give an opinion, this is very respectable, there are just looking to be contrary, destabilize, createcurrent of opinion against someone who does not find it friendly and especially his “favorite target” are these coaches with enough personality to not swallow or policy enforcement, and the press, or the fans.Demonstrated technical ability, knowledge and professionalism to not allow interference in their work and not live permanently under the “tyrannical yoke” that many want to impose and which unfortunately are victims other coaches whose position in the team directed not have a “status”exceedingly important. Street Soccer,Street Football,Soccer Forum

Soccer

One school of whatever, is a place where it is taught primarily in the present case is that children learn to play football, but one thing is what should be and a very different reality.

Today the College Football concept is widespread and there are many public and private coin is called, but it really all meet the main objective for which they were created?, Ie, is it really teaches, oron the contrary what is really looking for are other purposes that have nothing to do with what is offered?

It is all very well to talk about College Football, but if one is not for show it, maybe the name sounds great, but if after the internal structure fails because there is no real training project that supports the presumedlearning offered, the thing comes to nothing and the teaching concept is diluted in the air as fast as a sugar cube in a cup of coffee.

That does not mean that there are no good Schools of Football, and there are many, a modest coming out ahead by a lot of effort and a great deal of imagination on the part of people who run them and others with many more resources, with highquality standards and demanding, and highly trained technicians to provide the best possible learning the players of tomorrow.

The intention here is simply saying what we believe is not a football school, solely for the purpose of making a real distinction that it is, that no one should confuse and mislead no one issame thing happens when we speak for example of a certain brand of clothing, the original and the copy are mixed resulting in ambiguous, are almost identical, but not equal, there is something fundamental that the difference, although some insist on putting cata poke in a ceremony of the confusion that can fool many but obviously not all.

So based on the above would read:

1 – A College Football is not a series of computers that simply participating in a competition within the various existing categories depending on the age of the children competing.

2 – In a true College Football does not have children with the goal since training only in the weekly competition, ie, working only in terms of playing the league match without regard for the actual individual needs of teaching,especially at technical level.

3 – A College Football is a group formed by people who run the various equipment of the institution, claiming the role of coaches, when they have the qualifications required to do much less well prepared to work with children.

4 – It’s not a football school, where the technicians with the appropriate qualifications are merely exercising of staff carrying out routine training based solely on theoretical approaches that limit their creativity and ultimately causes them to become coaches muzzled, thatexercised only transmitter of intellectual dictatorship and interventional individual or individuals who manage / coordinate the presumed School.

5 – A College Football is not a place where the work to be done in different training sessions takes place without prior planning and follow a consistent pre-established schedule to allow the activity to be undertaken with due seriousness and effectivenessprimarily served the different ages of children and differentiated and specific work to be performed on that basis.

6 – A College Football is not a haphazard place where improvisation takes over day to day activity to do in each workout.

7 – A place where really not educated in values is not a real football school that you think education permissive permissiveness (will not be that children estresen too) is always better than the requirement taken torequired level based on the age of the players and the real needs that arise when participating in sports competition.If you do not take advantage of the real values offered by the sport as responsibility, discipline, effort, and in the case of football in particular, teamwork and camaraderie, among others, can not be talking about school,as we will be depriving children of an aspect of teaching basic sports training.

8 – And of course it is not a football school, is a place where what matters is to cash to make ends meet, the goal is to have many children enrolled to increase revenue in a progressive and significant, and whereeconomic performance is the main objective and the rationale behind the school.

“No matter if the kids really like football, if they behave properly, if they train seriously, if they meet the schedules and so on., Etc …..What really counts is that in order to meet his parents paid the receipt “

One could go on with more examples, but exposed, are sufficient to distinguish what is what is not, simply add that it is something fundamental about what must be a real College Football, which corresponds to its share of directorsas an entity, like any other formed by a large number of people who belong to it, it needs effective leadership driven primarily by a person with a modern mentality and spirit of participation that encourages brainstorming and teamwork, seeking people with ability and personality and not individuals unprepared but docile and easy to handle.The more freedom to have a pressure-free technical support to develop their ideas and unleash their creativity, within an order of course, more will enrich the students that are part of the school, because they also learn to think for themselves,to be capable of invention and may ultimately positively develop their imagination, which no doubt a very beneficial impact on their personal development and football, and none of this would be achieved if they are applied with high interventional pedagogiesdoctrinal component is now quite outdated, but most likely some have not learned from living completely out of reality. Street Soccer,Street Football,Soccer Forum